Brooks Ghost 18 Review | Still the Most Polarizing Neutral Shoe in the Lineup

I was excited to check out the Ghost 18 to see what changes and upgrades have been made. Especially after we received so many comments from runners who truly hated the changes over the last few years to the feeling underfoot.

I’ve been running in Brooks shoes for years. I have run in the Ghost for a long time before switching to the Brooks Glycerins for my last two marathon training cycles, turns out I do love a little extra cushion for long days.

If you know Brooks, you probably know the Ghost. It’s one of those neutral shoes that has built one of the most loyal followings in running, not because it does anything flashy, but because it just works well for many runners.

The Ghost 18 keeps that tradition going, with a few updates to the upper that are actually worth talking about. But if you weren’t a fan of the 17, then you’re probably not going to be a fan of the 18 and on the flipside if you loved the 17 WOHOOOO you’ll love this too.

I want to be upfront: this is my honest take, one runner’s real experience. Nobody paid me to say any of this, which is what makes shoe reviews so interesting!

The Ghost 18 is your dependable daily training shoe. If you want something that’s going to hold up run after run without making you think too hard about it, this is it. It’s not your race shoe; it’s not your speed workout shoe. It’s the one you reach for the rest of the time, and it does that job really well.

Brooks Ghost 18 Overview

My daily trainers have to earn their place in my shoe rotation. I want a shoe that feels smooth, reliable, and gets me excited to step out the door. This one has proven itself time and time again.

So far, I’ve taken the Ghost 18 out three times: two short, easy runs and a 90-minute long run. That’s not 500 miles of data, but it’s enough to get a real sense of a shoe — especially for someone who’s spent years training in Brooks shoes.

For context, my go-to has been the Brooks Glycerin. I love that shoe. More cushion, a little softer underfoot, it’s hard to beat for long training runs. The Ghost 18 isn’t quite the Glycerin, and I don’t think it’s trying to be.

It’s a step down in cushion and softness, which isn’t a knock, that’s just what it is. If you want that max plush feeling, the Glycerin is your shoe. But the Ghost fills a different role, and it fills it well.

The Ghost 18 keeps the same DNA LOFT v3 cushioning from the Ghost 17, but Brooks made some real improvements to the upper to include the new soft flat-knit tongue, new sockliner for a softer inside, better breathability, and a slightly roomier toe box. Nothing earth-shattering, but the kind of updates that add up over miles.

The Ghost 18 earns points for its versatility. The Ghost feels appropriate across a range of paces and distances, which is exactly what you want from a daily trainer.

One thing I always notice with Brooks across the board: the durability. I typically get 400 to 500 miles out of a pair before I start thinking about replacing them. That’s not a small thing when you’re deep in a training cycle and don’t want to be breaking in new shoes every few months.

Coach Amanda: I hate to be the buzzkill in this relationship, but I haven’t liked the last few models of the Ghost. This one still feels like it’s lacking cushion under the forefoot and the overall ride is very meh. This from someone who has been gravitating towards lower stack and lower cushion shoes like the Kinvara and Hoka Mach.

In fact, when we announced the preview of the Ghost 18 I was SHOCKED how many of you hated the 17. For those folks, I really hope you’ll checkout the new Glycern Flex, I’m seriously in love with that model.

I ended up with the Star White/Cyber Peach/Grey colorway, and I’m genuinely happy about it. It’s one of my favorite colorways as it’s light and fresh, but not too flashy. Sometimes, shoe colors matter more than we want to admit.

Looks-wise, I really like what Brooks did here. The colorway I have up is one of my favorites because it’s simple enough that I don’t mind being seen in it outside of a run, which isn’t always the case with training shoes. The two-tone mesh upper is more breathable, and the reflective hit on the heel is a nice, practical touch for early morning miles. Nothing over-the-top, just a good-looking shoe.

Is a 10mm high drop running shoe a con? It all depends on what you need, but a lot of runners are finding happier knees and IT bands with a more moderate drop. Others absolutely need that 10mm to keep the achilles happy or if they have less rang of motion it the ankles.

Brooks Ghost 18 Fit

The fit on the Ghost 18 felt very similar to the previous versions. The midfoot was secure without squeezing, laces held their tension through the full 90-minute run, and I didn’t have to fiddle with anything mid-stride.

The toe box has a little more room than the previous version. Not dramatically so, but enough that my toes weren’t feeling crowded toward the end of a longer effort. For standard-width feet it feels roomy but not loose.

The arch is neutral without an aggressive structure pushing up into your foot. The midfoot stayed snug enough that I never felt the need to re-tie or over-cinch the laces.

The new tongue is one of the better updates. It’s soft, stays put, and doesn’t create any pressure on the top of the foot even after wearing the shoe all morning. The fact that I have nothing bad to report there is honestly the best thing I can say.

Heel felt secure with a bit of padding throughout, better than the Ghost 17. No slipping, no Achilles irritation, and no hot spots even on the longer run.

Brooks Ghost 18 Feel

Underfoot, the Ghost 18 is what I’d call lightly cushioned, slightly less than the Glycerin and noticeably less cushioned than a racing shoe like the Adidas Adios Pro 4. The DNA LOFT v3 foam has some softness to it without feeling squishy or unstable. I would say it feels solid and stable, which is really what you want for most training runs.

The long run is where this shoe earned my trust. My legs felt fine at the end, no soreness I’d attribute to the shoe, no beat-up feeling in the knees or hips. The transitions are smooth, and there’s nothing aggressive about the ride. It just keeps moving you forward, which, after a lot of miles, is exactly what you want.

Compared to the Glycerin, there’s slightly less cushion underfoot and it’s a touch firmer. For most daily runs that actually felt fine and made me more connected to the road without sacrificing comfort.

If I’m going really deep into a long run, though, I might still reach for the Glycerin out of habit.

The upper breathes well, the outsole grips without drama, and the overall weight at 10.2 oz for men’s feels appropriate for what this shoe is. Not light, but not sluggish either.

And knowing Brooks shoes typically hold up for 400-500 miles before needing to be replaced, the value is genuinely solid for a $150 shoe.

Looking for more shoe reviews and training tips?

• Do Carbon Fiber Insoles Work?
• Sole F80 Treadmill Review
• We Tested runDisney x Brooks Collection